Tax and financial advice from the Silicon Valley expert.

Very high-income taxpayers should probably accelerate donations to 2025

Not all of the tax law changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) enacted July 4, 2025 favor high-income taxpayers.

For example, effective for tax years beginning after 2025, under Section 70425 of the Act, the charitable contributions tax deduction for individuals is reduced by 0.5% of the taxpayer’s contribution base for the taxable year.

The contribution base is the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income, computed without regard to any net operating loss carryback to the taxable year.

For most taxpayers, this reduction might not seem significant. For example, if John has adjusted gross income of $1,000,000, the reduction would be $5,000.

Taxpayers with much higher income are hit harder. For example, if Jane has adjusted gross income of $20 million, the reduction would be $100,000. Jane would be in the 37% marginal federal income tax bracket plus 3.8% for the net investment income tax, or 40.8%, so this tax law change could increase Jane’s federal income tax liability by $40,800 for 2026 compared to 2025. If Jane makes $100,000 of charitable contributions each year, she should consider accelerating the contributions she would normally make during 2026 to 2025.

Charitable contributions disallowed because of the 0.5% of contribution base reduction are added to the charitable contributions carryover amount that might be deductible during the 5 subsequent tax years. They are only added to the charitable contributions carryover if the deduction ceiling amount is exceeded, such as 60% of the contribution base for cash contributions to qualifying charities. Otherwise, the deduction for the disallowed charitable contributions are lost. In the example above, if Jane made $100,000 of charitable contributions for 2026, the 60% limitation would be $12 million, so the tax deduction for $100,000 would not be added to the charitable contributions carryover and would be lost.

Another OBBBA change effective after 2025 reduces the tax benefit of itemized deductions by 2/37 (about 5.4%) of the lesser of (1) itemized deductions before the “haircut”, or (2) the taxable income of the the taxpayer, before itemized deductions, that exceeds the threshold for the 37% tax bracket. Note this “haircut” applies to itemized deductions after the 0.5% reduction of charitable contributions.

For example, Jane has taxable income for 2026, before itemized deductions, of $20 million, and itemized deductions before the “haircut” of $1,000,000. The 2026 threshold for the 37% tax bracket for a single person is $640,600. The taxable income, before itemized deductions, exceeding the threshold is $20 million – $640,600 = $19,359,400. The “haircut” would be $1,000,000 X 2/37 = $54,054.

Note that taxpayers age 70 1/2 or older may make qualified charitable distributions (QCDs) from a traditional IRA of up to $108,000 for 2025 and $111,000 for 2026. QCDs aren’t taxable and aren’t subject to the contribution base limits that apply for other charitable contributions. QCDs also “count” for satisfying required minimum distribution (RMD) requirements for traditional IRAs that currently apply for taxpayers who reached age 73 during 2025 or the ages when RMDs applied for earlier years.

Taxpayers who haven’t decided where to donate their charitable contributions yet can “park” the funds in a donor advised fund, community foundation or a private foundation. Lower maximum deduction thresholds might apply.

The 0.5% reduction of the charitable contributions deduction and the 2/37 “haircut” of itemized deductions are only two of the significant changes in OBBBA that are making tax planning more complicated, with many different effective dates and thresholds. Taxpayers should consult with tax advisors who work with tax planning software that incorporates these changes and understand the rules for charitable planning.

When Iceland’s Women Took the Day Off

The United Nations declared 1975 “The International Women’s Year”, leading to a Women’s Congress in Iceland during June, 1975.

Icelandic women gained the right to vote in 1915 and elected the first woman to parliament in 1922. In 1975, only 5% of the representatives in parliament were women.

Women were fed up with earning much less than men, having a “glass ceiling” at work, and performing most of the housework, with little or no appreciation for the importance of their contribution to Iceland’s economy. 60% of Icelandic women worked outside the home.

Led by the feminist group called the Red Stockings, the women at the Women’s Congress decided to do something about it. They proposed having a strike, but strikes were illegal in Iceland, except for labor unions and employer’s associations. So, they decided to “take a day off” on October 24, 1975.

Bear in mind that the population of Iceland in 1975 was 219,262 and there was only one national television station and one national radio station. Such an effort would be much more difficult in the United States.

There was a massive effort, supported by publicity in the media, to get participation. Women mailed postcards and letters, handed out brochures and flyers, went door to door, and made phone calls.

The morning of the “Day Off”, the front page of every newspaper in Iceland featured the Women’s Day Off. The morning newspaper, Morgunblaðið, promised to put the story on the front page provided typesetters who were taking the day off came in early to get the newspapers out, so they came in at midnight to get the job done.

90% of the women in Iceland participated in the Day Off. About 25,000 Icelandic women flooded the streets of Reyjkjavic to participate in protests.

Housewives told their husbands to prepare their own meals, care for the children and do the chores. Many husbands took their children to work. Grocery stores ran out of easy-to-cook sausages. Men called the day “The Long Friday.”

Banks and most other businesses closed for the day. Schools closed. Telephone service was shut down.

In response, Iceland adopted several women’s rights-related policies, including universal childcare and a law making paternity leave more accessible for fathers. In 1976, Iceland passed an equal rights law. In 2018, Iceland became the first country in the world to enforce equal pay for women and men for companies or organizations with 25 or more employees.

The percentage of women in parliament increased from 5% in 1983 to 46%.

In 1980, Vigdís Finnbogadóttir became the fourth president of Iceland, serving 16 years to 1996, and was the first woman in the world elected president of a country. The current president of Iceland is Halla Tómasdóttir, elected in 2024. The current prime minister of Iceland is Kristrún Frostadóttir.

Women still face challenges in Iceland. Although Iceland has more wage parity than any other nation, there is still a wage gap. Gender-based violence is widespread and women still perform the lion’s share of housework.

During 2024, director Pamela Hogan and producer Hrafnhildur Gunnadsdóttir released their documentary movie of the Day Off, The Day Iceland Stood Still. The movie has been shown on a very limited basis in the United States. It is currently available on Iceland Air international flights.

The World Economic Forum has named Iceland as the world’s most equitable society for women for 16 years. In 2025, nearly all of Iceland’s top positions, including the prime minister, president, chief of police and heads of all public and private universities, are held by women.

Tax and financial advice from the Silicon Valley expert.